VetAhead

July 2023 newsletter

Hello, Vetaheader! Our monthly newsletter is here. Once again, we have papers on mammals, birds and reptiles!

First, we have a paper on the comparison of portable blood glucose meter (PBGM) analyzer with a benchtop point-of-care (POC) chemistry analyzer for evaluating blood glucose in ferrets. Since hypoglycemia is common in ferrets due to the high prevalence of insulinoma in them, this is very important! It has been found that a veterinary PBGM (AlphaTrak® 2 on canine setting) is preferred over a human one for ferrets (you can find details here). However, in this study, the VetScan VS2 was used (also a veterinary PBGM) in comaprison to a POC benchtop analyzer (modified hexokinase method).

Glucose concentration was measured from 82 blood samples from client-owned ferrets with the benchtop POC chemistry analyzer and the veterinary PBGM. Their results showed that glucose values obtained with the PBGM used were not in agreement with the benchtop POC chemistry analyzer, and it underestimated blood glucose concentration in many cases. However, variation was unpredictable: PBGM globally underestimated BG, but also had overestimations, meaning it was not consistently inaccurately low.

The take home message is: the PBGM used in this study is not acceptable for glucose measurement in pet ferrets, since results were inconsistent with unpredictable variation and wide limits of agreement, and significant clinical error is possible. Use of benchtop POC chemistry analyzers should be prioritized over PBGM for rapid acquisition of results and clinical decision making in an ER setting.

 

Second, we have a pharmacokinetic (PK) study on the antinociceptive effects of buprenorphine in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus). Sixteen adult (≥ 2 years old) cockatiels (8 males and 8 females) were used in a randomized complete crossover study. Buprenorphine is a mu opioid receptor agonist and kappa and delta antagonist that is used to treat moderate pain that has a slow onset and is long acting, with a dose dependent analgesic effect.

For the evaluation of antinociceptive effects, they received either buprenorphine hydrochloride at each of 3 doses (0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 mg/kg) or saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (control treatment), all IM. Foot withdrawal response to a thermal stimulus was determined before (baseline) and 0.5, 1.5, 3, and 6 hours after treatment administration. Agitation-sedation scores were also determined. 

For the pharmacokinetic analysis, buprenorphine (0.6 mg/kg) was administered IM to 12 of the birds, and blood samples were collected at 9 time points ranging from 5 minutes to 9 hours after drug administration. Samples were analyzed with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with commercial software. 

Their results showed that buprenorphine at 0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 mg/kg did not significantly change the thermal foot withdrawal response or caused sedation when compared with the response for the control treatment. Plasma buprenorphine concentrations were > 1 ng/mL in all 4 birds evalu­ated at 9 hours

The take home message is: buprenorphine at the doses evaluated did not significantly change the ther­mal nociceptive threshold for cockatiels, or cause sedative or agitative ef­fects. 


Lastly, we have a case report on an 
endoscopic-guided technique for foreign body removal in bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps).  A 1-yr-old intact female bearded dragon was presented approximately 24 h after having been seen eating a marble. Radiographs showed the presence of a spherical foreign body (she truly ate it) within the stomach, and after using contrast, a pyloric outflow obstruction was diagnosed. Under general anesthesia, a rigid scope was used to visualize the structure and guide a 12 French red rubber catheter, that was cut in half and reversed so the narrow end fit a 20 mL Luer-lock syringe, and the wide end could be used to produce an airtight seal onto the infamous marble. The instrument was advanced using endoscopic guidance and stabilized in position via external digital manipulation.

There are few case reports of nonsurgical foreign body removal in reptiles, since their small size can restrict the use of rigid endoscopy; biopsy forceps and grasping forceps have been reported – but they may be hard to use with smooth and round objects (like, for example, a marble 😬). Other anatomic locations most likely to have a foreign body that could be resolved with this technique include esophagus, stomach, and trachea.

The take home message is: bearded dragons and other similarly sized lizards with round/smooth foreign bodies in the upper GI may be able to avoid gastrotomy by using rigid endoscopy and a red rubber/syringe technique.

 

Hope these help you and, as always, I will see you next month!

Sincerely,

Laila Proença